Referral

Posted on by user

Introduction
Referral — the act of directing a matter, person or question to another forum, expert, or procedure for consultation, review or further action — is a small word with outsized consequences in Indian practice. In litigation and dispute resolution it determines who decides the controversy (judge, arbitrator, mediator, expert board), how fast and cheaply it will be resolved, what remedies are available, and which procedural rules govern. For practitioners, understanding the statutory hooks, the thresholds courts apply when making referrals, and the tactical use (and avoidance) of referrals is indispensable.

Core Legal Framework
Below are the primary statutory and constitutional provisions in which “referral” plays a decisive role in Indian law:

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 8
  • Section 8(1): where a party to an arbitration agreement brings an action in a court, the court shall refer the parties to arbitration if the court is satisfied that the dispute is prima facie referable to arbitration. (See also Section 8(2) and (3) for procedure and exceptions.)
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Section 89
  • Section 89: empowers civil courts to refer disputes to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms (arbitration, conciliation, judicial settlement including Lok Adalat, or mediation) where it appears there exists a possibility of settlement.
  • Constitution of India — Article 143
  • Article 143: Presidential reference to the Supreme Court for advisory opinions on questions of law or fact of public importance; a particular form of formal “referral” to the apex Court.
  • Ancillary and institutional rules
  • Court rules and mediation/conciliation rules (Supreme Court Rules, High Court Rules, District Mediation Rules), institutional arbitration rules (LCIA, SIAC, ICC as applicable), and Guidelines of the Mediation and Conciliation Project Committee (MCPC) of the Supreme Court implement referrals to ADR in practice.

Practical Application and Nuances
Referral is not a unitary concept in law; it is a functional one that recurs in several different procedural contexts. Below are the common referral scenarios you will encounter and the way courts approach them.

  1. Referral to Arbitration under Section 8, Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  2. When to invoke: A defendant (or plaintiff) served with court proceedings grounded on a contract containing an arbitration clause should move under Section 8 to have the court refer the parties to arbitration.
  3. Standard applied by courts: The court examines (a) existence of a valid arbitration agreement, and (b) whether the subject matter of the suit is covered by that agreement. The threshold is prima facie — courts do not try the whole dispute on merits; they confine themselves to a quick look at documents and pleadings.
  4. Procedure & practical trifles:
  5. File an application under Section 8 before filing a written statement; many courts treat appearance without contest as waiver.
  6. Annex certified copy of the arbitration agreement (or the clause in the contract), plaint, and the relevant contract provisions.
  7. Court may stay further proceedings and refer matter to arbitration (Section 8(1)). If there are disputes on validity or applicability of the arbitration agreement (e.g., severability, incorporation by reference), the court may decide that limited question before referring.
  8. Tactical points:
  9. Obtain urgent interim relief (injunction, preservation) before referral, or simultaneously apply for interim relief under Section 9 (Arbitration Act) — because arbitral tribunals may be slower.
  10. Where relief sought is injunctive and urgency is present, courts sometimes refuse immediate reference if interim rights would be prejudiced.

  11. Check forum and seat issues: if the seat is outside India, application of Part I differs (see BALCO principle below).

  12. Referral to ADR/mediation under Section 89, CPC

  13. When to refer: When in a civil suit it appears there is a possibility of settlement. This is usually discovered by the court on reading pleadings, or on an application by a party.
  14. Practice mechanics:
  15. Courts will ordinarily record a finding that there is scope for settlement and refer to one of the specified modes (mediation, conciliation, Lok Adalat, arbitration).
  16. Referral is typically by order indicating the mode and appointing/referring to an institution or mediator; parties may be asked to file settlement statements and report back within a time frame.
  17. Partly successful mediation may result in consent decree (Order XXIII Rule 3, CPC) or compromise decree.
  18. Nuances:
  19. Referral is discretionary, but courts are expected to actively encourage settlement where appropriate. The court should assess whether the dispute is capable of settlement (e.g., questions of title involving third-party rights or complex facts may not be suitable).
  20. Confidentiality: settlements are generally confidential, but parties should seek explicit confidentiality stipulations in the settlement and ensure the court’s order preserves privilege.
  21. Tactical points:
  22. If your client will not compromise, resist referral by demonstrating lack of scope for settlement or risk to public interest.

  23. Use mediation to extract commercial settlements but insist on preserving jurisdictional objections and limitation defences in writing before mediation begins.

  24. Referral to Experts / Medical Boards / Investigation Agencies

  25. Common in criminal and civil litigation: courts often refer questions of injury, mental capacity, patent validity, valuation, etc., to court-appointed experts or committees.
  26. Practical approach:
  27. Seek a specific terms-of-reference: limit the expert’s remit carefully and ask for an affidavit of the expert that frames conclusions and materials relied upon.
  28. Challenge expert reports by cross-examination and by adducing counter-experts.
  29. Evidence management:

  30. Ensure chain of custody and that the expert examined primary material; object to ex-parte reports and seek re-examination if the procedures were irregular.

  31. Presidential and Constitutional References

  32. Article 143 is used rarely, for significant issues of public importance that require the Court’s advisory view. Practitioners dealing with constitutional litigation should be aware that an executive reference can pre-empt or influence litigation strategy, but the Supreme Court’s advisory opinion is not strictly binding in the same way as a judgment in a contested case.

Landmark Judgments
– Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc., (2012) 9 SCC 552 (BALCO)
– Principle: While BALCO dealt with the reach of Part I of the Arbitration Act to arbitrations seated outside India, its key practical import for referrals is the Court’s approach to the interplay between court jurisdiction and arbitration law — e.g., whether courts should make referrals where the seat is foreign and whether Part I curial remedies apply. Practitioners must evaluate seat and governing law before moving for or resisting a Section 8 referral.
– Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. NEPC India Ltd., (1999) 2 SCC 479
– Principle: The Supreme Court recognized that while arbitration clauses are binding, courts retain limited powers to grant interim reliefs in aid of arbitration and should not thwart parties’ substantive rights by a mechanical referral. The decision underlines the need to seek prompt interim steps before or along with a Section 8 application.
– Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (P) Ltd., (2010) 8 SCC 24
– Principle: Clarified jurisdictional questions and the court’s role in arbitration-related applications (notably Section 11 references and appointment disputes). The case highlights that the court’s intervention must be measured and that procedural routes to refer or appoint are to be used with discipline.

Strategic Considerations for Practitioners
Below is a practical checklist and strategy guide you can apply immediately:

  • Pre-referral due diligence
  • Scrutinize the arbitration clause (scope, seat, governing law, institutional rules, escalation/step clauses).
  • Preserve interim remedies in court (injunctions, appointment of receiver, preservation of assets). Apply under Section 9 and/or seek ad-interim orders in the suit before asking for a referral.

  • Ascertain limitation and laches exposure. ADR may toll or may not; filing positions should preserve limitation pleas.

  • Crafting the referral application / response

  • Under Section 8: plead succinctly the arbitration clause (attach it), assert prima facie referability, and seek immediate reference; if opposing, identify clear exclusion (statutory bar, public law question) and show why the dispute is not arbitrable.

  • Under Section 89: propose the appropriate ADR mode; include suggested mediators/institutions and draft terms of reference; insist on confidentiality and indicative timelines.

  • Use referrals as leverage

  • Referral can be tactical — offer mediation to extract a settlement or use threat of arbitration to obtain commercial concessions. Conversely, resist frivolous referral requests if your client’s claim is primarily public law or involves non-arbitrable relief (e.g., certain matrimonial or tenancy disputes depending on statute).

  • Avoid common pitfalls

  • Waiver: don’t appear and litigate the merits where an arbitration clause applies — appearance without reservation can be treated as waiver of right to arbitrate.
  • Over-broad referrals: if a mediator’s remit is not tightly defined, parties may be forced into unfocussed negotiations. Draft precise terms of reference and a clear settlement framework.
  • Neglecting enforcement strategy: a settlement or award is only as good as the enforcement path. Consider whether an award will need confirmation or whether a settlement decree will be executable.

  • Confidentiality and admissibility: insist on clear orders that settlement communications shall not be admissible in subsequent proceedings.

  • Document management and evidence strategy during referrals

  • Keep a contemporaneous record of settlement discussions, but segregate privileged communications.
  • If experts are appointed, preserve evidence, secure exhibits and ask for contemporaneous photographs, bills, or data to underpin expert conclusions.

Conclusion
“Referral” is a procedural fulcrum: it shifts decision-making to another forum (arbitrator, mediator, expert, larger bench) and thus reshapes litigation strategy, timelines, remedies and costs. For practitioners the operative rules are simple to state and harder to master in practice: (1) always check the statutory provision that makes referral appropriate (Section 8 or Section 89 are primary hooks); (2) preserve interim rights before or contemporaneously with referral applications; (3) define terms of reference and confidentiality; (4) use referral as negotiation leverage but avoid waiver; and (5) plan the enforcement path once a settlement or award is likely. Mastery of these practicalities turns “referral” from an administrative act into a litigation and commercial advantage.