Giffen Good

Posted on by user

Giffen Goods: Definition, How They Work, and Examples

Key takeaways
* A Giffen good is an essential, low-income good whose demand rises when its price increases, producing an upward-sloping demand curve.
* This paradox arises when the income effect of a price change outweighs the substitution effect.
* Giffen behavior is rare and requires specific conditions: the good is a staple for low-income consumers, there are few close substitutes, and the price change significantly alters real purchasing power.
* Empirical evidence is limited but includes a well-known field study showing rice behaved like a Giffen good in parts of rural China.

What is a Giffen good?

A Giffen good violates the usual law of demand: instead of buying less when price rises, consumers—typically low-income households—buy more. The phenomenon is named after Sir Robert Giffen, who was said to have observed such behavior for staple foods in the 19th century.

Why this happens: income and substitution effects

Two forces determine how quantity demanded responds to a price change:

  • Substitution effect: when a good’s price rises, consumers tend to substitute toward cheaper alternatives (reduces quantity demanded).
  • Income effect: when a price rises, a consumer’s real purchasing power falls. For a staple that constitutes a large share of a poor household’s budget, this reduction in real income can force households to cut back on more expensive items (e.g., meat) and consume even more of the cheaper staple.

A good behaves as a Giffen good only when:
* The income effect (forced shift toward the staple as real income falls) is larger than the substitution effect.
* The staple has few close substitutes.
* The good takes a large share of the budget of low-income consumers.

Economic intuition (simple illustration)

Imagine a poor household that spends most of its budget on a cheap staple and a small amount on a more expensive protein. If the staple’s price rises, the household can’t afford as much protein and must reallocate spending—cutting protein and buying more staple to meet caloric needs. Even though the staple is now more expensive, quantity demanded of it increases because the household’s effective purchasing power has fallen.

Historical notes and empirical evidence

  • Classical anecdote: Alfred Marshall recounted Giffen’s observation that bread prices appeared to rise demand because poorer consumers could no longer afford meat and substituted toward bread. That story has been debated by later historians and economists.
  • Field evidence: A prominent randomized field experiment by Jensen and Miller found strong evidence of Giffen behavior for rice in Hunan province, China. When the subsidized price of rice fell, households consumed less rice (substituting toward other goods); when the subsidy was removed and the effective price rose, rice consumption increased. Evidence for wheat in another province (Gansu) was weaker.

Giffen goods versus Veblen goods

Both Giffen and Veblen goods can exhibit upward-sloping demand curves, but for different reasons:

  • Giffen goods
  • Driven by necessity and income effects.
  • Typical consumers are low-income; higher price reduces real income and pushes them to consume more of the staple.

  • Examples: basic staples in constrained budgets (historical examples like bread or rice under particular conditions).

  • Veblen goods

  • Driven by conspicuous consumption and status signaling.
  • Higher price makes the good more desirable to high-income consumers (prestige effect).
  • Examples: designer handbags, luxury watches, high-end vehicles.

Why Giffen goods matter

  • They highlight limits of simple demand intuition and show how income distribution and budget shares affect market responses.
  • Policy implications: subsidies or price changes for staples can have counterintuitive effects on consumption patterns among the poor; careful empirical study is needed before designing interventions.
  • They are rare, so most demand analysis still relies on the standard downward-sloping demand assumption—but exceptions matter for poverty, nutrition, and welfare policy.

Conclusion

Giffen goods are an uncommon but important exception to the law of demand. They arise when a staple item occupies a large share of a poor household’s budget and when the income effect of a price change outweighs substitution toward alternatives. Empirical confirmation is limited but existent; recognizing Giffen behavior helps explain unusual consumption responses to price changes in constrained populations.