Great Moderation

Posted on by user

The Great Moderation

The Great Moderation refers to a multi-decade period of reduced macroeconomic volatility in the United States starting in the mid-1980s and lasting until the financial crisis of 2007–2008. During this era, fluctuations in real GDP and inflation declined markedly: the standard deviation of quarterly real GDP roughly halved and the variability of inflation fell by about two-thirds. The period was characterized by low and stable inflation, milder recessions, and steadier economic growth compared with the volatile decades that preceded it.

Key takeaways
* The Great Moderation describes lower volatility in output and inflation from the mid-1980s until the late 2000s.
* Explanations include structural economic change, improved macroeconomic policy, and fewer shocks (or “good luck”).
* The period ended with the financial crisis and Great Recession, highlighting limits to relying solely on monetary stability.

Why it mattered
* Before the Great Moderation, the U.S. experienced large swings in inflation and output — 1970s stagflation, volatile interest rates, and deep recessions.
* The shift to steadier performance reduced the frequency and severity of economic downturns, which many policymakers and economists viewed as a sign of policy success and structural resilience.

Explanations for the slowdown in volatility
Economists pointed to three broad causes for the calmer macroeconomic environment:

  1. Structural change
  2. Technological advances (notably computing) improved business forecasting and inventory management.
  3. The economy shifted toward services, which tend to have more stable demand than manufacturing.

  4. Financial innovation and greater openness to international trade and capital flows altered the way shocks were absorbed.

  5. Improved economic policy

  6. Modernized monetary policy frameworks (anti-inflation credibility and better policy rules) reduced the size and persistence of inflationary episodes.

  7. Central banks placed greater emphasis on price stability, which helped anchor expectations and dampen cycles.

  8. Fewer or smaller shocks (“good luck”)

  9. Some research suggests that the environment simply experienced fewer large adverse shocks in that period, making the economy look structurally more stable even if underlying vulnerabilities remained.

How the era ended
The Great Moderation came to an abrupt halt with the housing collapse and global financial crisis of 2007–2008. Key elements of that failure include:

  • Built-up imbalances: Extended periods of easy monetary conditions and financial innovation encouraged higher leverage, risk-taking, and asset-price bubbles—especially in housing.
  • Global dynamics: Openness and deep international capital flows helped export or absorb inflationary pressures, masking underlying domestic imbalances.
  • Policy limits: Traditional monetary policy focused on stabilizing inflation and output; it did not fully address financial-sector vulnerabilities or asset-price booms.
  • Crisis trigger: The housing-market collapse, mortgage losses, and frozen credit markets produced a severe contraction—exposing the fragility that had accumulated during the moderation period.

Lessons and implications
* Stability is not permanence: Low variability in inflation and growth can coexist with accumulating financial risks. Calm periods may encourage complacency.
* Broader policy toolkit needed: Effective macroeconomic management requires not only monetary policy aimed at inflation and output but also macroprudential regulation to constrain leverage, monitor systemic risk, and limit asset bubbles.
* Monitor structural changes: Technology, globalization, and financial innovation change transmission mechanisms; policymakers must adapt to how these affect risk distribution and shock absorption.
* Trade-offs matter: Policies that minimize short-term volatility can raise long-term tail risks if they obscure buildup of imbalances.

Conclusion
The Great Moderation was an important episode of reduced macroeconomic volatility that reshaped policy thinking. Its abrupt end in the financial crisis underscored that apparent stability can conceal systemic weaknesses. A balanced approach—maintaining price stability while actively managing financial risks—remains essential to avoid repeating the same trade-offs.