Tracking Error: What It Is and Why It Matters
Key takeaways
* Tracking error measures how closely a portfolio follows its benchmark; it’s typically the standard deviation of the difference between portfolio and benchmark returns.
* Major drivers include fees and costs, sampling/replication choices, liquidity and trading frictions, ETF mechanics (cash, premiums/discounts, futures roll), taxes, and currency/hedging costs.
* Ex‑post (realized) tracking error evaluates past deviations; ex‑ante (expected) tracking error estimates future deviation for risk management.
* Tools range from spreadsheets for retail investors to institutional platforms (Bloomberg, Morningstar Direct, BlackRock Aladdin, MSCI Barra).
What is tracking error?
Tracking error quantifies the divergence between a portfolio’s returns and those of its benchmark. Formally:
Tracking error = standard deviation of (P − B)
where P is the portfolio return and B is the benchmark return over matched periods (daily, monthly, etc.). It’s usually expressed as a percentage.
Explore More Resources
A low tracking error means the portfolio closely replicates the benchmark; a high tracking error indicates greater deviation. For passive investors, low tracking error is typically desirable. For some active managers, a higher tracking error may reflect intentional deviation to seek excess return.
How it’s calculated (simple steps)
- Compute return differences for each period: d_t = P_t − B_t.
- Calculate the mean of d_t.
- Compute the standard deviation of the d_t series.
- The resulting number is the tracking error (annualize if using daily returns).
Example:
Mutual fund returns (5 years): 11%, 3%, 12%, 14%, 8%
S&P 500 returns: 12%, 5%, 13%, 9%, 7%
Differences: −1%, −2%, −1%, +5%, +1%
Standard deviation of differences ≈ 2.50% → tracking error ≈ 2.5%.
Explore More Resources
Why tracking error matters
- Performance evaluation: It shows consistency relative to the benchmark; large tracking error with weak returns can signal poor management or unintended risk.
- Risk management: Ex‑ante tracking error guides portfolio construction when targeting a specific active risk budget.
- Product selection: Helps investors choose ETFs/index funds that effectively replicate their benchmarks.
Key influences on tracking error
- Fees and operating costs
- Management expense ratios directly reduce fund returns and increase tracking error relative to a costless index.
- Replication method and sampling
- Full replication vs optimized sampling: sampling can produce differences when thinly traded or illiquid index constituents are avoided.
- Liquidity and bid‑ask spreads
- Illiquid securities and wide spreads produce slippage and execution differences from the index.
- Cash holdings and cash drag
- ETFs hold cash (dividends, settlement lags) while indexes do not; uninvested cash can drag returns.
- Premiums and discounts to NAV
- Market prices may diverge from NAV, especially in thinly traded ETFs; authorized participants typically arbitrage small divergences.
- Index changes and rebalancing
- Timing and transaction costs when tracking indexes cause temporary or persistent deviations.
- Securities lending
- Lending fees can offset costs and reduce tracking error if the manager uses them.
- Taxes and capital‑gains distributions
- Realized taxable events create after‑tax differences from index returns.
- Currency and hedging
- Currency hedging costs and fluctuations affect international ETF performance relative to unhedged benchmarks.
- Futures roll and commodity ETFs
- Contango/backwardation on futures contracts causes systematic roll gains or losses versus spot.
- Leveraged and inverse ETFs
- Daily rebalancing of derivatives leads to path‑dependent returns that can diverge substantially from the benchmark multiple over time.
Ex‑post vs. Ex‑ante tracking error
- Ex‑post (realized): Backward‑looking, uses historical returns to measure how closely a portfolio tracked its benchmark. Useful for performance review.
- Ex‑ante (expected): Forward‑looking, estimated from risk models, factor exposures, and current portfolio holdings. Useful for portfolio construction and risk budgeting.
Tools for analysis
- Retail: Excel, Google Sheets (manual calculation, basic modeling).
- Professional: Bloomberg Terminal, Morningstar Direct (automated returns, analytics).
- Institutional: BlackRock Aladdin, MSCI Barra, Axioma (advanced risk models, real‑time analytics, integration with trading systems).
Practical guidance for investors
- For passive strategies, prefer funds with low tracking error and low expense ratios.
- Check trading liquidity and average bid‑ask spreads for ETFs to avoid execution‑related tracking error.
- Compare the fund’s replication method (full replication vs sampling) and how it handles dividends, taxes, and rebalances.
- Use ex‑post tracking error to evaluate historical replication; use ex‑ante tracking error when assessing prospective risk of active positions.
Frequently asked questions
Q: Is a lower tracking error always better?
A: For index replication, generally yes. For active managers, a higher tracking error may be acceptable if it’s associated with a positive active return (alpha).
Q: How is tracking error different from beta?
A: Beta measures sensitivity to market moves (systematic risk). Tracking error measures the volatility of deviations from a benchmark. A portfolio can have low beta but high tracking error, or vice versa.
Explore More Resources
Q: Should individual investors worry about tracking error?
A: Yes for passive ETF/index fund selection — it affects how closely the product delivers the benchmark return after fees and costs.
Conclusion
Tracking error is a fundamental metric for evaluating how faithfully a portfolio or fund replicates its benchmark and for managing active risk. Understanding its causes — fees, replication choices, liquidity, tax, currency, and ETF mechanics — helps investors choose products and construct portfolios aligned with their objectives.