Beta
Beta (β) measures a security’s price volatility relative to a benchmark market (commonly the S&P 500). It indicates how much systematic risk a stock or portfolio contributes compared with the broader market.
Key takeaways
- A market index has β = 1.0.
- β > 1: security is more volatile than the market.
- β < 1: security is less volatile than the market.
- β < 0: security moves inversely to the market.
- Beta is useful for gauging relative volatility and for models like CAPM, but it’s based on historical data and has limitations for predicting future risk.
How beta works
Beta is the slope from a regression of an asset’s returns against the market’s returns. It quantifies how much the asset tends to move when the market moves:
Explore More Resources
- If the market rises or falls by 1%, an asset with β = 1.5 tends to move about ±1.5% on average.
- An asset with β = 0.5 tends to move about ±0.5%.
- An asset with β = -1 tends to move opposite the market, roughly equal in magnitude.
Beta captures systematic (market) risk, not company-specific (unsystematic) risk. Investors can reduce unsystematic risk through diversification, but systematic risk remains.
Beta is commonly used in the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which links expected return to beta:
Expected return = risk-free rate + β × (market return − risk-free rate)
Explore More Resources
Calculating beta
Beta is calculated from historical return series:
Beta (β) = Covariance(R_e, R_m) / Variance(R_m)
Explore More Resources
where:
* R_e = returns of the individual security
R_m = returns of the market benchmark
Covariance measures how the security and market returns move together
* Variance measures how spread out the market returns are
Choose a benchmark appropriate to the asset class (e.g., an equity index for stocks). Using an unrelated benchmark (like S&P 500 for a bond ETF) produces misleading beta.
Explore More Resources
Interpreting beta values
- β = 1.0 — Security tends to move in line with the market; adds no relative volatility.
- 0 < β < 1 — Less volatile than the market; lowers portfolio volatility (other things equal). Utility and consumer staples stocks often fall here.
- β > 1 — More volatile than the market; can increase both risk and return potential. Growth and technology stocks often have higher betas.
- β < 0 — Inversely correlated with the market (rare); examples include certain inverse ETFs, some hedges, and some commodity-linked assets.
Example: If the market rises 10% and a stock has β = 1.2, the stock’s average expected rise would be about 12%.
How investors use beta
- Portfolio construction: combine higher- and lower-beta assets to target a desired volatility profile.
- Risk assessment: estimate how portfolio returns might respond to market moves.
- Asset pricing: input for CAPM to estimate expected return given market risk.
- Benchmark validation: check R-squared of the regression to ensure the benchmark explains the asset’s returns (high R-squared = benchmark is a relevant comparator).
R-squared (0–100%) shows how much of the asset’s return variation is explained by the benchmark. Low R-squared suggests beta is a weak summary for that asset/benchmark pair.
Explore More Resources
Limitations and practical cautions
- Historical measure: beta is based on past returns and may not reflect future behavior.
- Assumes linear, normally distributed returns: real-world returns can be skewed or fat-tailed, reducing beta’s predictive power.
- Sensitive to sample period and frequency: different time windows, return intervals (daily vs. monthly), or benchmarks produce different betas.
- Ignores fundamentals: beta doesn’t account for company financials, growth prospects, or event-specific risk.
- Direction vs. volatility: a low beta does not guarantee returns will be positive—an asset can be low-beta and in a long-term decline.
Conclusion
Beta is a simple, widely used measure of relative market volatility and systematic risk. It’s valuable for portfolio design and inputs to pricing models but should be combined with fundamental analysis, appropriate benchmarking, and awareness of its historical and statistical limitations.