Equitable Relief: How It Works
Equitable relief is a court-ordered remedy that requires a party to take—or stop—specific actions when monetary damages would not adequately remedy a wrong. It is commonly used in breaches of contract, intellectual property disputes, and other situations where restoring the parties to a fair position requires more than money.
Key points
- Equitable relief compels or restrains conduct (e.g., by injunction), unlike legal remedies that award money.
- Courts grant equitable remedies when monetary compensation is inadequate or would not prevent irreparable harm.
- Common forms include rescission, specific performance, rectification, and injunctions (including gag orders in sensitive cases).
- A claimant seeking equitable relief must generally show they acted in good faith (“clean hands”) and that the balance of harms supports the remedy.
How equitable relief operates
Equitable relief is used to prompt or prevent action. A typical enforcement mechanism is an injunction, which orders a party to do or refrain from doing something and can carry civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance. Contract clauses sometimes acknowledge that legal damages would be insufficient and permit or anticipate equitable remedies.
Explore More Resources
Courts consider factors such as:
* Whether monetary damages would be inadequate;
* Whether the claimant would suffer irreparable injury;
* Whether the claimant acted fairly (the “clean hands” principle);
* The balance of equities between the parties.
Common forms of equitable relief
- Rescission: Cancels a contract and restores parties to their pre-contract positions.
- Specific performance: Orders a party to fulfill contractual obligations as originally agreed (often used for unique goods or real property).
- Rectification: Revises a contract to reflect the parties’ true intentions.
- Injunctions: Prevent or compel actions—temporary or permanent; in IP or confidentiality disputes, this can include gag orders preventing disclosure.
Typical contexts
- Breach of contract — when subject matter is unique or harms cannot be fully measured in money (e.g., property, rare goods).
- Intellectual property and trade secrets — to stop misuse or disclosure that could cause reputational or competitive harm not fixable by damages.
Practical considerations
- Equitable relief is discretionary; courts weigh fairness and public interest in granting it.
- Claimants should act promptly; unreasonable delay can defeat an equitable claim.
- Defenses include showing equitable principles weigh against relief (e.g., claimant’s own misconduct).
Takeaways
- Equitable relief compels or restrains actions rather than awarding money.
- It is appropriate when legal remedies are inadequate or harm would be irreparable.
- Courts apply equitable doctrines—like clean hands and balancing equities—when deciding whether to grant relief.
- Typical remedies include rescission, specific performance, rectification, and injunctions.