Understanding the Information Coefficient (IC): Definition, Formula, and Example
Key takeaways
- The information coefficient (IC) quantifies how closely an analyst’s or manager’s forecasts match actual outcomes, typically stock returns.
- IC ranges from −1.0 (perfectly wrong) to +1.0 (perfectly correct); 0 indicates no predictive value beyond chance.
- IC evaluates forecasting skill; it is distinct from the Information Ratio (which compares excess returns to risk) but is a component of the Fundamental Law of Active Management.
What the IC measures
The information coefficient is a measure of forecasting accuracy. It describes the correlation between predicted and actual returns, so a higher IC indicates better alignment between forecasts and outcomes. Practitioners use it to assess the skill of investment analysts or active portfolio managers.
How it’s calculated
There are two common ways to view the IC:
Explore More Resources
-
General definition: IC is the correlation between predicted values (or rankings) and subsequent actual returns. This correlation can be computed using Pearson or rank correlation methods depending on the prediction format.
-
For binary directional forecasts (correct vs. incorrect), the IC can be expressed from the proportion of correct predictions:
IC = (2 × Proportion Correct) − 1
where Proportion Correct = fraction of forecasts that were directionally correct.
Range:
* IC = +1.0 → perfect predictions
* IC = 0.0 → predictions no better than random
* IC = −1.0 → predictions consistently opposite reality
Explore More Resources
Interpreting IC and its impact
- IC close to +1: strong forecasting skill.
- IC near 0: forecasting performance may be indistinguishable from chance (directional guesses have about a 50/50 baseline).
- IC close to −1: consistently wrong predictions (rare in practice).
The IC is one input into the Fundamental Law of Active Management, which links forecasting skill and the number of independent investment decisions (breadth) to overall performance. The Information Ratio and IC are related but measure different things: IC gauges accuracy of forecasts, while the Information Ratio assesses returns relative to risk.
Examples
Using the binary formula IC = (2 × p) − 1:
Explore More Resources
-
If an analyst makes two predictions and both are correct (p = 1.0):
IC = (2 × 1.0) − 1 = +1.0 -
If the analyst is correct half the time (p = 0.5):
IC = (2 × 0.5) − 1 = 0.0 -
If none are correct (p = 0.0):
IC = (2 × 0.0) − 1 = −1.0
Limitations and best practices
- Sample size matters: IC is meaningful only when derived from a large number of forecasts. Small samples can yield extreme ICs by chance.
- Type of forecast: The interpretation differs for directional (binary) forecasts versus continuous/value forecasts. Use the appropriate correlation measure for the forecast type.
- Statistical significance: Evaluate whether the observed IC is statistically different from zero before inferring skill.
- Practical rarity: ICs near −1 are uncommon; values near +1 are rare and, if persistent, indicate genuine skill.
Conclusion
The information coefficient is a concise, interpretable metric for assessing forecasting accuracy. Use it with sufficiently large sample sizes, choose the correct calculation method for the forecast type, and consider it alongside other performance measures (such as breadth and the Information Ratio) to evaluate an analyst’s or manager’s contribution to investment performance.