Next-In, First-Out (NIFO)
What is NIFO?
Next-In, First-Out (NIFO) is an inventory valuation approach that assigns to sold items the cost that would be required to replace them (the current or replacement cost), rather than the original historical cost paid when the inventory was purchased.
Explore More Resources
How it works
- Under NIFO, cost of goods sold (COGS) is measured using the cost of the next units the company would buy to replace those sold.
- This makes COGS reflect current market prices; inventory on the balance sheet is effectively tied to replacement cost rather than historical cost.
- Companies typically apply NIFO for internal pricing and management reporting to reflect economic reality during changing price levels.
Why NIFO is not GAAP-compliant
- NIFO violates the historical cost (cost) principle used in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), which requires recording goods at their original purchase cost.
- Because it departs from GAAP, NIFO cannot be used for external financial statements or statutory tax reporting; firms that apply NIFO internally must still prepare audited reports using GAAP-compliant methods (e.g., FIFO or LIFO where permitted).
Comparison with FIFO and LIFO
- FIFO (First-In, First-Out): COGS uses the oldest inventory costs; ending inventory reflects recent purchases.
- LIFO (Last-In, First-Out): COGS uses the most recent inventory costs; ending inventory reflects older costs.
- NIFO: COGS uses the current replacement cost, not the historical costs of any specific purchase batch. It emphasizes current economic cost rather than past purchase prices.
Example
- Sale price: $100
- Original cost (historical): $47 → reported profit using historical cost = $53
- Replacement cost at time of sale: $63 → NIFO-based profit = $37
This illustrates how using replacement cost reduces reported profit relative to historical-cost valuation when replacement prices have risen.
When and why companies use NIFO
- Primarily used internally when inflation or rapid price changes make historical costs a poor guide for pricing and margin decisions.
- Helps management price products, estimate margin sustainability, and plan cash flow based on the cost they will actually incur to replenish inventory.
- Often used alongside GAAP-compliant reporting; NIFO informs operational decisions while external financials follow required accounting standards.
Pros and cons
Pros
– Provides a more economically relevant measure of margin under inflationary conditions.
– Aids pricing decisions and working-capital planning by reflecting replacement costs.
Cons
– Not acceptable for external financial reporting (non-GAAP).
– Can create differences between internal and audited results, complicating analysis and audits.
– May introduce administrative complexity to maintain parallel valuation systems.
Explore More Resources
Key takeaways
- NIFO values COGS at replacement cost rather than historical cost.
- It offers operational insight during inflation but is not GAAP-compliant and cannot be used for audited financial statements.
- Companies commonly use NIFO internally for pricing and margin analysis while reporting externally using GAAP methods like FIFO or LIFO.