Understanding Risk Parity: Strategies and Real-World Examples
What is risk parity?
Risk parity is a portfolio allocation approach that sizes positions by their contribution to overall portfolio risk rather than by capital weights. Instead of assigning a fixed percentage of capital to stocks, bonds, or other assets (for example, a 60/40 split), risk parity targets an even distribution of volatility or risk across assets. Managers then use leverage, hedging or short positions as needed to reach a chosen overall risk or return objective.
Explore More Resources
Key takeaways
- Risk parity allocates based on risk contributions, not capital allocations.
- It typically equalizes volatility across asset classes so no single asset dominates portfolio risk.
- Leverage and derivatives are often used to achieve targeted risk and return levels.
- Implementation requires quantitative modeling and is most common among institutional or sophisticated investors.
- Examples of funds using this approach include the AQR Risk Parity Fund and Horizon’s Global Risk Parity ETF.
How risk parity works
- Estimate each asset’s volatility and correlations with other assets.
- Determine each asset’s risk contribution (typically volatility × position size adjusted for correlation).
- Scale positions so each asset contributes roughly the same share of total portfolio risk.
- If the resulting unlevered portfolio is below the investor’s target risk level, use leverage to increase exposure while maintaining equalized risk contributions.
The objective is to pursue the optimal expected return for a chosen level of portfolio risk, improving diversification by preventing equities or any single asset class from dominating total portfolio volatility.
Key strategies and concepts
- Equal-risk weighting: The core idea — size allocations so each asset contributes equally to portfolio volatility.
- Leverage and derivatives: Used to raise portfolio risk to a desired level without upsetting the equal-risk balance.
- Short selling and hedging: Employed when managers want to reduce exposure to particular risks or achieve better risk parity across instruments.
- Relation to MPT and CAPM: Risk parity builds on modern portfolio theory’s focus on risk and return but shifts the allocation decision to risk contributions. Concepts like the security market line (SML) and beta are relevant, though some assumptions (e.g., a constant SML slope) may not hold in practice.
Practical considerations and limitations
- Complexity: Requires reliable estimates of volatilities and correlations and continuous rebalancing; sophisticated quantitative systems are typically needed.
- Costs and constraints: Leverage and derivatives introduce costs, margin requirements and counterparty risks.
- Model risk: Outcomes depend on input estimates; regime shifts or persistent changes in correlations can reduce effectiveness.
- Suitability: Commonly used by institutional investors and hedge funds; not necessarily appropriate for all retail investors without professional management.
Real-world examples
- AQR Risk Parity Fund — a diversified strategy that invests across global stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities with the aim of balancing risk.
- Horizon Global Risk Parity ETF — an exchange-traded fund that implements equal risk-weighted volatility distribution across its holdings.
Conclusion
Risk parity is a quantitative allocation method that equalizes risk contributions across assets and uses leverage to reach target portfolio risk. It can enhance diversification compared with traditional capital-weighted portfolios, but it requires sophisticated modeling, active management and careful attention to leverage-related costs and risks.