Understanding Tier 2 Capital: Definition and Key Takeaways
Key takeaways
* Tier 2 capital is a bank’s supplementary capital, used alongside Tier 1 (core) capital to meet regulatory capital requirements.
* It includes revaluation reserves, general provisions, hybrid instruments, and subordinated debt.
* Total regulatory capital is expressed as a ratio to risk-weighted assets (RWA); the minimum is 8%, with at least 6% required from Tier 1 capital.
* Tier 2 is considered lower quality than Tier 1 because it is harder to liquidate and to value accurately.
* International standards for capital adequacy are set by the Basel Accords.
What is Tier 2 Capital?
Tier 2 capital is the secondary (supplementary) layer of a bank’s capital base. It provides additional loss-absorbing capacity beyond core (Tier 1) capital and helps banks meet minimum regulatory capital requirements. Because Tier 2 items are generally less liquid and harder to value than Tier 1, they are treated as lower-quality capital.
Explore More Resources
Regulatory context
Capital requirements are defined under the Basel framework. A bank’s capital ratio is calculated as total capital divided by its risk-weighted assets (RWA). Regulators typically require a minimum total capital ratio of 8% of RWA, with a defined portion of that coming from higher-quality capital. No more than 25% of required capital may be satisfied using Tier 2 instruments in many regimes.
Main components of Tier 2 capital
Tier 2 capital typically comprises four categories:
Explore More Resources
- Revaluation reserves
-
Gains recognized from revaluing assets (for example, increases in the value of real estate owned by the bank).
-
General provisions
-
Reserves set aside for probable but unspecified loan losses and other contingencies. Regulatory frameworks commonly limit the amount of general provisions that count toward Tier 2 (for example, up to 1.25% of RWA).
-
Hybrid capital instruments
-
Instruments that combine features of debt and equity (e.g., some preferred shares). Hybrids are included only if they behave sufficiently like equity—i.e., losses can be taken against the instrument without forcing liquidation.
-
Subordinated term debt
- Debt instruments that rank below depositor claims and senior debt. To qualify as Tier 2, subordinated debt generally must have a minimum original maturity (commonly over five years).
Upper and lower Tier 2
Tier 2 capital can be divided into upper and lower components:
* Upper-level Tier 2: perpetual securities (no maturity), revaluation reserves, and certain fixed-asset investments.
* Lower-level Tier 2: subordinated debt and other instruments with set maturities; these are often less expensive for banks to issue but are lower quality than upper-level items.
Nuances and exceptions
- Undisclosed reserves: Some countries permit undisclosed reserves (profits not shown on public financial statements) to count as Tier 2, though many jurisdictions—including the United States—do not accept them for regulatory capital purposes.
- National regulators may apply additional rules or limits on what counts as Tier 2, and how much can be recognized toward minimum capital requirements.
How Tier 2 compares with Tier 1 (and Tier 3)
- Tier 1 capital (core capital) is the highest-quality capital and includes common equity and disclosed reserves. It is easier to measure and to liquidate and is the primary buffer against losses.
- Tier 2 is supplementary and of lower quality; it supplements Tier 1 but cannot replace core capital.
- Tier 3 (tertiary) capital historically supported market risk in trading books but is lower quality than Tier 2; Tier 3 has been phased out under newer Basel reforms.
Minimum capital adequacy
Under the Basel framework referenced by many regulators, banks must maintain a minimum capital ratio (total capital to RWA) of at least 8%, with a significant portion required to be Tier 1. Tier 2 contributes to meeting the remainder of the minimum capital requirement, subject to caps and eligibility rules.
Explore More Resources
Conclusion
Tier 2 capital strengthens a bank’s loss-absorption capacity beyond its core capital, but it is considered less reliable because it is harder to value and convert to cash. Understanding the composition and limits of Tier 2 is essential for assessing a bank’s regulatory capital position and overall financial resilience.